Dec. 17, 2025
Scope Creep Survival Guide
Scope creep doesn’t arrive with a siren; it shows up as “just one more” request and quietly doubles your workload. In this episode, I break down a practical, humane way to protect your timeline and still make room for good ideas—so you ship value now and again soon, without burnout.
We start by drawing clean edges around the work: a one‑page scope brief, an explicit out‑of‑scope list, and a shared definition of done. From there, we name one final approver to end circular edits, set a simple change path, and design feedback rounds that serve the build instead of stalling it. Then we move into team dynamics. You’ll hear how to build a working alliance with your SME—align on behavior‑based outcomes, co‑create a must‑keep vs nice‑to‑have list, agree on response norms, and use a one‑page feedback guide to keep comments focused at the right stage.
You’ll leave with ready‑to‑use scripts for out‑of‑scope requests, late feedback, and conflicting SME guidance; a checklist of common pitfalls to dodge; and a steady cadence to deliver learning products on time without gold plating. If this helped you tame scope creep, subscribe, share with a teammate, and leave a thoughtful review so more designers can find it.
🔗 Episode Links:
Please check out the resources mentioned in the episode. Enjoy!
Scope Creep Survival Checklist
Scope Creep in Project Management
📑 References:
Adobe for Business (2025). Scope creep in project management. Retrieved October 7, 2025, https://business.adobe.com/blog/basics/scope-creep
Join PodMatch!Use the link to join PodMatch, a place for hosts and guests to connect.
Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.
💟 Designing with Love + allows you to support the show by keeping the mic on and the ideas flowing. Click on the link above to provide your support.
☕ Buy Me a Coffee is another way you can support the show, either as a one-time gift or through a monthly subscription.
🗣️ Want to be a guest on Designing with Love? Send Jackie Pelegrin a message on PodMatch, here: Be a guest on the show
🌐 Check out the show's website here: Designing with Love
📱 Send a text to the show by clicking the Send Jackie a Text link above.
👍🏼 Please make sure to like and share this episode with others. Here's to great learning!
00:00 - Framing Scope Creep
01:20 - Move 1: Set Project Guardrails
02:47 - Move 2: Align with SMEs
04:01 - Move 3: Backlog and Reviews
05:15 - Move 4: Managing Midstream Changes
06:24 - Move 5: Microlearning Rescue Walkthrough
10:01 - Pitfalls and Boundary Scripts
11:17 - Free Checklist and Recap
12:20 - Closing and Support
WEBVTT
00:00:00.719 --> 00:00:04.240
Hello, and welcome to the Designing with Love Podcast.
00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:12.240
I am your host, Jackie Pelegrin, where my goal is to bring you information, tips, and tricks as an instructional designer.
00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:17.440
Hello, instructional designers and educators.
00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:22.480
Welcome to episode 73 of the Designing with Love Podcast.
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:32.960
In this episode, I'll share practical tips for handling scope creep and mid-project changes so you can keep momentum and deliver successful projects.
00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:39.840
So, grab your notebook, a cup of coffee, and settle in as we explore this topic together.
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:44.240
If you're thinking, okay, but what is scope creep exactly?
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:45.679
You're not alone.
00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:58.320
According to Adobe for Business, Scope Creep occurs when project requirements expand beyond the original plan, which leads to delays, budget overruns, and resource strain.
00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:07.680
Unfortunately, uncontrolled changes and shifting priorities can quickly turn a well-structured project into a challenging one to manage.
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:16.879
In instructional design, it often looks like just one more module, let's add a scenario, or can we squeeze in another review round?
00:01:16.879 --> 00:01:20.000
It starts small, then snowballs.
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:29.920
Today I'll walk through five practical moves to prevent and manage scope creep, plus a real-world example you can model on your next project.
00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:34.239
Move one, set the guardrails before kickoff.
00:01:34.239 --> 00:01:40.159
First, let's stop scope creep before it starts, right at the starting line.
00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:45.040
When we set clear boundaries up front, creep has nowhere to hide.
00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:49.200
One way you might do this is to create a one-page scope brief.
00:01:49.200 --> 00:02:03.760
This could contain elements such as the problem you're solving, the audience, measurable objectives, deliverables, an out-of-scope list, the timeline, review rounds, and your definition of done.
00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:07.359
Next, name a single final approver.
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:12.000
Others can be consulted, but one person makes the call.
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:19.520
Finally, establish your change path, how requests are submitted, who approves, and how you'll gauge impact.
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:22.560
Here's something you could say to your stakeholders.
00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:27.280
To keep this efficient, here's our scope brief and definition of done.
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:33.199
New ideas are welcome, let's route them through the change step so nothing gets lost.
00:02:33.199 --> 00:02:35.039
Here's some watchouts.
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:39.680
Skip the out-of-scope list and promise as many reviews as it takes.
00:02:39.680 --> 00:02:42.240
And you've opened the door to unlimited work.
00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:46.960
With the guardrails set, let's strengthen the relationship that makes them work.
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:52.159
Move two, build a working alliance with your subject matter experts.
00:02:52.159 --> 00:03:00.400
Next, let's align with your subject matter experts because great process only works when the relationship works.
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:04.800
Your subject matter expert isn't a gatekeeper, they're your partner.
00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:08.960
Here you can open with two grounding questions.
00:03:08.960 --> 00:03:12.080
What must learners do differently after this?
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:15.199
What would make you say this was a win?
00:03:15.199 --> 00:03:21.840
Next, co-create a mini glossary and a must keep versus nice to have list.
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:27.360
Then, agree on response time norms and a preferred channel.
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:34.319
Finally, share a one-page feedback guide so comments focus on accuracy at the right stage.
00:03:34.319 --> 00:03:37.759
Here's something you could say to your subject matter expert.
00:03:37.759 --> 00:03:41.919
I'll own the learning strategy, you own the content accuracy.
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:45.680
Together, we'll get to the outcomes that matter.
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:47.520
Here's some watchouts.
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:55.039
Letting content experts dictate pedagogy and collecting parallel feedback without a single final decider.
00:03:55.039 --> 00:04:02.159
With the partnership aligned, let's give every idea a home without derailing delivery.
00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:06.800
Move three, manage requests like a product backlog.
00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:10.719
Then we'll organize the work so it actually ends.
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:16.399
Make sure to track requests with a simple backlog and prioritize with Moscow.
00:04:16.399 --> 00:04:21.839
This stands for must, should, could, and won't for now.
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:26.319
This gives you language to say yes, but not today.
00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:30.240
Next, I recommend establishing time box reviews.
00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:32.560
Usually two rounds works well.
00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:38.480
Round one can be structure and alignment, while round two is accuracy only.
00:04:38.480 --> 00:04:51.920
Finally, ensure you name versions clearly, such as storyboard version 0.9 to version 1.0, and keep a short decision log with the date, the decision, who made it, and why.
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:55.519
Here's something you could say when a new idea pops up.
00:04:55.519 --> 00:04:56.800
Great idea.
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:03.040
I'll log it as a could for version 1.1 so we protect the version 1 date.
00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:04.800
Here's some watch outs.
00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:13.759
Mixing net new content with final accuracy edits and ending up with file chaos, like final, final, really final.
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:20.560
Even with a great backlog, changes still happen, so let's channel them on purpose.
00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:25.360
Move four, tame midstream changes with a clear path.
00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:29.040
After that, we'll shift from no to yes if.
00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:43.839
If one moves, the others flex.
00:05:43.839 --> 00:05:48.000
Next, offer two option framing every time.
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:54.240
Implement now and move the date, or keep the date and schedule it for the next release.
00:05:54.240 --> 00:06:00.319
Finally, maintain a parking lot for future ideas and review it at milestones.
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:03.439
Here's something you could say when timing is tight.
00:06:03.439 --> 00:06:13.279
We can add the scenario now and move launch to November 4th, or keep November 1st and schedule it for version 1.1.
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:14.959
Which works best?
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:23.360
Here's some watch outs gold plating, which is adding extras no one asked for, and undocumented verbal agreements.
00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:28.240
Now let me show you how these moves come together in real life.
00:06:28.240 --> 00:06:33.920
Move 5, real life example, rescuing a ballooning microlearning.
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:39.920
Finally, let's put you in the moment and walk you through how these moves play out.
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:43.839
You're leading a 15-minute onboarding microlearning.
00:06:43.839 --> 00:06:51.839
Two weeks in, the quick ads start, a new policy, an extra scenario, just one more quiz item.
00:06:51.839 --> 00:06:57.680
By the rough cut, your timeline's tight and the script is creeping towards 60 minutes.
00:06:57.680 --> 00:07:02.079
You can feel it, good intentions, but too much content.
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:04.959
Here's how you can steer it back on track.
00:07:04.959 --> 00:07:08.079
Step one, re-anchor scope.
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:11.680
You bring the group together for a five-minute reset.
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:16.000
You share the one-page scope brief and reread the definition of done.
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:24.160
Instantly, everyone remembers the goal, a tight 15-minute experience focused on three measurable behaviors.
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:36.480
During this step, you could try saying something like the following Let's revisit our scope brief and definition of done so we're anchored on the outcome and what version one needs to include.
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.480
Step two, prioritize with Moscow.
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:44.720
You list every request, no judgment, just capture.
00:07:44.720 --> 00:07:49.600
Then you tag them must, should, could, won't for now.
00:07:49.600 --> 00:07:55.680
Two items clearly land as musts, the policy update and the new form tutorial.
00:07:55.680 --> 00:08:00.079
The extended scenario, extra examples and glossary are coulds.
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:08.399
During this step, you could try saying the following To keep version one crisp, I'm marking the policy update and form tutorials as musts.
00:08:08.399 --> 00:08:15.199
The longer scenario, extra examples and glossary are coulds, will schedule for the next release.
00:08:15.199 --> 00:08:18.000
Step three, negotiate impact.
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:21.519
You frame the choice simply and respectfully.
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:26.480
During this step, you could try saying the following We have two good paths.
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:36.159
We can add the new items now and move launch to November 4th, or keep the November 1st launch and schedule them for version 1.1.
00:08:36.159 --> 00:08:39.279
Which best serves our learners and the deadline?
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:43.120
Step four, lock review purpose.
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:47.440
You time box the final review and define what belongs in it.
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:50.399
Accuracy only, no new content.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:56.879
During this step, you could try saying the following This final window is for accuracy checks only.
00:08:56.879 --> 00:09:01.200
Any new ideas will go into the parking lot for version 1.1.
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:06.320
Step five, ship version one, then version 1.1.
00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:07.919
You publish on time.
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:15.840
Two weeks later, you release version 1.1 with longer scenarios and examples, without crunch, without delays.
00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:17.759
Here's your anchor line.
00:09:17.759 --> 00:09:26.480
By protecting the learner outcome and the date, you shipped value twice, once on time, and again with meaningful enhancements.
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:32.559
Before we wrap up, here's a few rapid fire pitfalls to keep top of mind.
00:09:32.559 --> 00:09:35.279
Here's the quick pitfall roundup.
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:41.200
First, having no single approver often leads to conflicting edits and stalled decisions.
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:44.559
Name one final decision maker up front.
00:09:44.559 --> 00:09:49.840
Second, writing objectives that aren't behaviors makes scope fuzzy.
00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:55.440
State what learners must do, not just what they'll know or understand.
00:09:55.440 --> 00:10:00.720
Third, allowing unlimited review rounds invites endless churn.
00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:05.519
Time box your reviews, two rounds with a clear purpose for each.
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:10.639
Fourth, keeping decisions only in email threads means nothing sticks.
00:10:10.639 --> 00:10:16.799
Maintain a simple decision log with the date, the decision, the owner, and the rationale.
00:10:16.799 --> 00:10:22.240
Fifth, switching tools mid-project adds risk and slows everyone down.
00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:27.279
Only change tools if there's a critical reason and communicate it clearly.
00:10:27.279 --> 00:10:32.720
Sixth, treating late feedback as a backlog derails timelines.
00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:38.799
Acknowledge it and route it to the next revision, version 1.1, so you can ship on time.
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:40.960
Here's some polite boundary scripts.
00:10:40.960 --> 00:10:46.320
So if you need some language to use on the fly, here's a few you can borrow if you'd like.
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:48.320
Here's one for out of scope.
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:49.840
That's a strong idea.
00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:54.799
I'll add it to our parking lot and note the impact if we put it into version one.
00:10:54.799 --> 00:10:56.720
Late feedback.
00:10:56.720 --> 00:11:00.399
To stay on schedule, we'll publish today at 3 p.m.
00:11:00.399 --> 00:11:03.919
Anything after that will be slated for version 1.1.
00:11:03.919 --> 00:11:07.200
Here's one for conflicting subject matter experts.
00:11:07.200 --> 00:11:08.960
I'm seeing different guidance.
00:11:08.960 --> 00:11:13.919
Can we confirm the single content approver so I can align to one source of truth?
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:20.080
If you'd like a plug and play resource, grab the free Scope Creep Survival checklist in the show notes.
00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:30.559
It includes a one-page scope brief template, change request prompts, a Moscow quick guide, a parking lot sheet, and a definition of done checklist.
00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:34.960
Make sure to try it on your next project and let me know how it goes.
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:53.039
As a recap, today's five moves were set guardrails before kickoff, build a working subject matter expert alliance, manage requests like a project backlog, tame changes with a clear path, and use the rescue playbook when things balloon.
00:11:53.039 --> 00:11:57.679
As I conclude this episode, here's an inspiring quote by Dwight D.
00:11:57.679 --> 00:11:58.960
Eisenhower.
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:03.440
Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:07.600
Thank you for taking some time to listen to this podcast episode today.
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:09.840
Your support means the world to me.
00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:18.639
If you'd like to help keep the podcast going, you can share it with a friend or colleague, leave a heartfelt review, or offer a monetary contribution.
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:24.480
Every act of support, big or small, makes a difference, and I'm truly thankful for you.
00:00:00.719 --> 00:00:04.240
00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:12.240
00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:17.440
00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:22.480
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:32.960
00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:39.840
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:44.240
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:45.679
00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:58.320
00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:07.680
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:16.879
00:01:16.879 --> 00:01:20.000
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:29.920
00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:34.239
00:01:34.239 --> 00:01:40.159
00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:45.040
00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:49.200
00:01:49.200 --> 00:02:03.760
00:02:03.760 --> 00:02:07.359
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:12.000
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:19.520
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:22.560
00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:27.280
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:33.199
00:02:33.199 --> 00:02:35.039
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:39.680
00:02:39.680 --> 00:02:42.240
00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:46.960
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:52.159
00:02:52.159 --> 00:03:00.400
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:04.800
00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:08.960
00:03:08.960 --> 00:03:12.080
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:15.199
00:03:15.199 --> 00:03:21.840
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:27.360
00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:34.319
00:03:34.319 --> 00:03:37.759
00:03:37.759 --> 00:03:41.919
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:45.680
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:47.520
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:55.039
00:03:55.039 --> 00:04:02.159
00:04:02.159 --> 00:04:06.800
00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:10.719
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:16.399
00:04:16.399 --> 00:04:21.839
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:26.319
00:04:26.319 --> 00:04:30.240
00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:32.560
00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:38.480
00:04:38.480 --> 00:04:51.920
00:04:51.920 --> 00:04:55.519
00:04:55.519 --> 00:04:56.800
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:03.040
00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:04.800
00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:13.759
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:20.560
00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:25.360
00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:29.040
00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:43.839
00:05:43.839 --> 00:05:48.000
00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:54.240
00:05:54.240 --> 00:06:00.319
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:03.439
00:06:03.439 --> 00:06:13.279
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:14.959
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:23.360
00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:28.240
00:06:28.240 --> 00:06:33.920
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:39.920
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:43.839
00:06:43.839 --> 00:06:51.839
00:06:51.839 --> 00:06:57.680
00:06:57.680 --> 00:07:02.079
00:07:02.079 --> 00:07:04.959
00:07:04.959 --> 00:07:08.079
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:11.680
00:07:11.680 --> 00:07:16.000
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:24.160
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:36.480
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.480
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:44.720
00:07:44.720 --> 00:07:49.600
00:07:49.600 --> 00:07:55.680
00:07:55.680 --> 00:08:00.079
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:08.399
00:08:08.399 --> 00:08:15.199
00:08:15.199 --> 00:08:18.000
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:21.519
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:26.480
00:08:26.480 --> 00:08:36.159
00:08:36.159 --> 00:08:39.279
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:43.120
00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:47.440
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:50.399
00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:56.879
00:08:56.879 --> 00:09:01.200
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:06.320
00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:07.919
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:15.840
00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:17.759
00:09:17.759 --> 00:09:26.480
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:32.559
00:09:32.559 --> 00:09:35.279
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:41.200
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:44.559
00:09:44.559 --> 00:09:49.840
00:09:49.840 --> 00:09:55.440
00:09:55.440 --> 00:10:00.720
00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:05.519
00:10:05.519 --> 00:10:10.639
00:10:10.639 --> 00:10:16.799
00:10:16.799 --> 00:10:22.240
00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:27.279
00:10:27.279 --> 00:10:32.720
00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:38.799
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:40.960
00:10:40.960 --> 00:10:46.320
00:10:46.320 --> 00:10:48.320
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:49.840
00:10:49.840 --> 00:10:54.799
00:10:54.799 --> 00:10:56.720
00:10:56.720 --> 00:11:00.399
00:11:00.399 --> 00:11:03.919
00:11:03.919 --> 00:11:07.200
00:11:07.200 --> 00:11:08.960
00:11:08.960 --> 00:11:13.919
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:20.080
00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:30.559
00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:34.960
00:11:34.960 --> 00:11:53.039
00:11:53.039 --> 00:11:57.679
00:11:57.679 --> 00:11:58.960
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:03.440
00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:07.600
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:09.840
00:12:09.840 --> 00:12:18.639
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:24.480
