Jan. 28, 2026

Gamification Strategies to Improve Learner Engagement

Gamification Strategies to Improve Learner Engagement

Want learners to finish training, remember it, and use it on the job? We walk through a no-fluff approach to gamification that starts with clear outcomes and ends with measurable behavior change. Instead of throwing points at problems, we show how to pair decision-based practice, tight feedback, and meaningful rewards to build real skill.

The heart of the episode is a practical toolkit: five common pitfalls and exactly how to flip them, plus the metrics that prove impact. We cover mastery rate, attempts to mastery, two-week retention checks, opt-in rates for competitive features, branch diversity, and decision quality. Then we map it to a real-world compliance scenario—recasting a static security course into short, branching missions with mastery badges, a mission board, and optional replays that improve outcomes. To help you start fast, we share a lightweight one-week A/B plan and the key events to instrument so you can call success with confidence.

Ready to test without a rebuild? Try the simple pilot: add a progress bar, a mastery-tied badge, and a narrative intro with role, mission, and stakes—then compare completion, time on task, and decision accuracy. If this playbook helps, subscribe, share with a teammate, and leave a review so we can spotlight your results next time.

🔗 Episode Links:

Please check out the resources mentioned in the episode. Enjoy!

Gamification for Learning: Strategies and Examples

Gamification Pilot Checklist

📑 References:

Buljan, M. (2025, October 2). Gamification for Learning: Strategies and Examples. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/gamification-for-learning-strategies-and-examples 

Send Jackie a Text

Join PodMatch!
Use the link to join PodMatch, a place for hosts and guests to connect.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.

Support the show

💟 Designing with Love + allows you to support the show by keeping the mic on and the ideas flowing. Click on the link above to provide your support.

Buy Me a Coffee is another way you can support the show, either as a one-time gift or through a monthly subscription.

🗣️ Want to be a guest on Designing with Love? Send Jackie Pelegrin a message on PodMatch, here: Be a guest on the show

🌐 Check out the show's website here: Designing with Love

📱 Send a text to the show by clicking the Send Jackie a Text link above.

👍🏼 Please make sure to like and share this episode with others. Here's to great learning!


00:00 - Setting Outcomes Over Points

01:31 - Core Mechanics That Drive Learning

02:36 - Story, Challenge, & Good Friction

04:05 - Motivation: Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness

05:23 - Pitfalls & What To Measure

08:11 - A Lightweight Measurement Plan

09:58 - Compliance Course Reimagined

11:16 - Results To Watch & Behavior Shift

WEBVTT

00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:04.240
Hello and welcome to the Designing with Love Podcast.

00:00:04.240 --> 00:00:12.240
I am your host, Jackie Pelegrin, where my goal is to bring you information, tips, and tricks as an instructional designer.

00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:17.440
Hello, instructional designers and educators.

00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:22.160
Welcome to episode 85 of the Designing with Love Podcast.

00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:28.399
In this episode, we'll dive into how game elements can increase learner engagement and motivation.

00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:33.520
You may be asking yourself, how do I effectively turn training into play?

00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:38.880
Let's explore how gamification can supercharge motivation and retention.

00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:45.679
So, grab your notebook, a cup of coffee, and settle in as we explore this topic together.

00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:50.960
Alright, let's set the stage with a simple principle that keeps your design focused.

00:00:50.960 --> 00:00:53.920
Start with the outcomes, not points.

00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:57.119
If the learning isn't clear, the game won't save it.

00:00:57.119 --> 00:00:59.359
State the performance outcome.

00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:16.560
After this, learners will be able to then pick specific mechanics that serve the outcome, such as decision paths for critical thinking, time challenges for recall fluency, and cases that can be unlocked for advanced application.

00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:18.879
Here's a quick pulse check.

00:01:18.879 --> 00:01:22.400
If I stripped the game layer, would the learning still work?

00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:25.920
If not, realign the activity to the outcome.

00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:30.799
With outcome set, let's talk about the game pieces that do the real work.

00:01:30.799 --> 00:01:33.280
Core mechanics that matter.

00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:41.040
Think in progress loops, levels, a simple progress bar, and a small wins that keep momentum visible.

00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:46.159
Tight feedback, immediate, specific coaching after each decision.

00:01:46.159 --> 00:01:47.840
Meaningful rewards.

00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:56.560
Points are fine, but connect badges to real skills or access, like a bonus scenario, say they feel earned, not handed out.

00:01:56.560 --> 00:01:58.799
Next up, the secret sauce.

00:01:58.799 --> 00:02:00.400
Story and challenge.

00:02:00.400 --> 00:02:02.879
Keep it simple and purposeful.

00:02:02.879 --> 00:02:05.359
Narrative and challenge design.

00:02:05.359 --> 00:02:08.159
Wrap tasks in a clear role in mission.

00:02:08.159 --> 00:02:09.120
Who am I?

00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:11.840
What's at stake and what's the time box?

00:02:11.840 --> 00:02:16.560
Start with safe wins, then escalate difficulty as skills build.

00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:19.599
Remember good friction versus bad friction.

00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:25.599
Puzzling decisions equals good, while extra clicks and slow loading equals bad.

00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:30.560
Now let's make it human because motivation is at the core of our needs.

00:02:30.560 --> 00:02:34.240
Autonomy, social play, and psychological needs.

00:02:34.240 --> 00:02:38.000
Autonomy, social play, and psychological needs.

00:02:38.000 --> 00:02:38.960
Autonomy.

00:02:38.960 --> 00:02:44.159
Let learners choose a role or path or take an optional side quest.

00:02:44.159 --> 00:02:45.120
Competence.

00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:48.080
Scaffold challenges so growth is visible.

00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:52.000
Relatedness, try co-op missions or team goals.

00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.080
Use leaderboards sparingly.

00:02:54.080 --> 00:02:58.719
Opt in or make them team based so they motivate without shaming.

00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:06.080
Finally, let's get practical about the common traps and how to flip them into learning wins you can measure.

00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:09.680
Avoiding pitfalls and measuring what matters.

00:03:09.680 --> 00:03:13.199
Pitfall number one, points without purpose.

00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:14.479
What happens?

00:03:14.479 --> 00:03:18.080
Learners chase points and rush but do not improve.

00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:19.120
Flip it.

00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:22.800
Tie rewards to mastery evidence, not seat time.

00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:28.479
For example, award a badge only when a learner demonstrates a skill threshold in a scenario.

00:03:28.479 --> 00:03:30.000
What to measure?

00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:31.280
Mastery rate.

00:03:31.280 --> 00:03:34.960
The percentage of learners who meet a defined rubric level.

00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:37.360
Meaning attempts to mastery.

00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:39.439
This should decrease over time.

00:03:39.439 --> 00:03:41.599
And finally, a retention check.

00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:45.919
Compare a two-week reattempt score to the first mastery score.

00:03:45.919 --> 00:03:51.120
Pitfall number two, leaderboards that demotivate the middle.

00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:52.240
What happens?

00:03:52.240 --> 00:03:56.000
The same few names stay on top while others disengage.

00:03:56.000 --> 00:03:57.280
Flip it.

00:03:57.280 --> 00:04:04.639
Use co-op goals such as Team Shields or Tiered Personal Bests, where learners try to beat their own prior score.

00:04:04.639 --> 00:04:07.840
Make leaderboards opt-in or team based.

00:04:07.840 --> 00:04:09.039
What to measure?

00:04:09.039 --> 00:04:11.840
Opt-in rate to competitive features.

00:04:11.840 --> 00:04:16.160
Participation from the rest of the group, not just the top names.

00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:18.240
And personal best improvement.

00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:20.800
Are people beating their own prior scores?

00:04:20.800 --> 00:04:23.120
Pitfall number three.

00:04:23.120 --> 00:04:25.360
One size fits all challenge.

00:04:25.360 --> 00:04:26.560
What happens?

00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:29.920
Tasks are too easy for some and too hard for others.

00:04:29.920 --> 00:04:31.120
Flip it.

00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:38.240
Add adaptive difficulty and just in time hints, while also letting learners choose a role or difficulty lane.

00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:39.600
What to measure?

00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:44.959
First attempt success by a segment such as novice, intermediate, and advance.

00:04:44.959 --> 00:04:47.120
Success after hints.

00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:50.959
Does using a hint lead to success within two steps?

00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:53.360
And then time to completion spread.

00:04:53.360 --> 00:04:57.439
A narrowing range suggests better difficulty fit.

00:04:57.439 --> 00:04:59.360
Pitfall number four.

00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:02.240
Cosmetic narrative with no decisions.

00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:03.360
What happens?

00:05:03.360 --> 00:05:07.120
A pretty story wrapper, but choices do not matter.

00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:08.399
Flip it.

00:05:08.399 --> 00:05:17.199
Design meaningful branches with tradeoffs like budget versus quality or speed versus accuracy, and show visible consequences.

00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:18.560
What to measure?

00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:23.920
Branch diversity, the number of unique paths taken per one hundred learners.

00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:33.279
Decision quality index, a rubric scored rationale or outcome, and a voluntary replay, or try alternate paths.

00:05:33.279 --> 00:05:37.199
Pitfall number five, shipping without a control.

00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:38.720
What happens?

00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:42.079
You cannot tell if gamification changed anything.

00:05:42.079 --> 00:05:43.040
Flip it.

00:05:43.040 --> 00:05:51.439
Run a small comparison, such as a gamified version compared to the original version, or a pre and post comparison with the same cohort.

00:05:51.439 --> 00:05:52.800
What to measure?

00:05:52.800 --> 00:06:05.199
Completion difference, comparing the gamified version to the original, decision accuracy difference on scenario items, and a job related behavior metric that improves within 30 to 60 days.

00:06:05.199 --> 00:06:09.839
For example, fewer phishing clicks or fewer rework tickets.

00:06:09.839 --> 00:06:19.199
Now that we have mapped the five common traps to fixes and meaningful metrics, let's turn that into a single plan you can run next week.

00:06:19.199 --> 00:06:22.000
Here's your quick lightweight measurement plan.

00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:30.399
First, capture a baseline, which is current completion, average scenario score, and one behavior metric.

00:06:30.399 --> 00:06:39.759
Then instrument three events, such as progress bar viewed, badge awarded for mastery, and scenario decision made, including the outcome.

00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:46.399
Then run one week comparing two versions, the gamified version compared to the original.

00:06:46.399 --> 00:06:50.800
Finally, call it success if completion increases by 5 to 10%.

00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:57.279
Decision accuracy increases by 8 to 10 points, and at least one behavior metric improves.

00:06:57.279 --> 00:06:58.240
Great.

00:06:58.240 --> 00:07:05.920
Now that you have a simple plan in hand, let me ground it with a detailed composite scenario you can model in your own context.

00:07:05.920 --> 00:07:09.439
Compliance that learners actually finish.

00:07:09.439 --> 00:07:11.199
Here's the scenario.

00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:15.600
Imagine the annual information security course that is sent to employees.

00:07:15.600 --> 00:07:17.680
Learners can't skip ahead.

00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:22.639
They must view each screen and then take a 10 question quiz at the end.

00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:26.639
The quiz allows unlimited retakes from a small item bank.

00:07:26.639 --> 00:07:28.480
What typically happens?

00:07:28.480 --> 00:07:42.399
People rush through the slides, guess their way through the quiz, miss the same two or three questions repeatedly, and end up retaking the quiz multiple times just to pass, without retaining the behaviors the organization actually needs.

00:07:42.399 --> 00:07:44.160
What could you change?

00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:45.600
Mission Framing.

00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:55.839
Recast the course as a branch response quest with three short decision-based scenarios, such as phishing email, USB drop, and data request.

00:07:55.839 --> 00:07:58.160
Progress you can feel.

00:07:58.160 --> 00:08:05.519
Replace the linear menu with a mission board and add a visible progress bar so momentum is obvious.

00:08:05.519 --> 00:08:07.600
Mastery based rewards.

00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:11.279
Unlock badges only when a learner demonstrates a skill.

00:08:11.279 --> 00:08:15.920
For example, Fish Hunter for catching subtle red flags and context.

00:08:15.920 --> 00:08:18.000
Quality over guessing.

00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:21.439
Swap the end of course quiz for a checkpoint scenario.

00:08:21.439 --> 00:08:27.120
Learners advance when their decisions meet a rubric, not simply after a number of items.

00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:28.720
Smart retries.

00:08:28.720 --> 00:08:36.559
Encourage voluntary replays with a beat your personal best prompt and a brief what I'll do differently next time reflection.

00:08:36.559 --> 00:08:38.080
Team Energy.

00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:45.919
Offer a department level digital shield when 90% of learners achieve an 85% or higher decision score.

00:08:45.919 --> 00:08:47.919
Here's what you might see.

00:08:47.919 --> 00:08:55.200
Fewer repeat quiz attempts and higher first past decision quality once choices happen in context.

00:08:55.200 --> 00:09:00.799
More voluntary replays aimed at improving scenario outcomes, not just guessing.

00:09:00.799 --> 00:09:08.399
Better, more targeted questions in office hours or discussion threads, which is evidence of deeper processing.

00:09:08.399 --> 00:09:16.240
A job related behavior shift within 30 to 60 days, such as fewer phishing clicks or fewer rework tickets.

00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:32.080
As you test this, look for the following completion improvement when you compare the gamified version to the original, decision accuracy improvement on scenario items, and first pass decision quality and voluntary replays trending in the right direction.

00:09:32.080 --> 00:09:36.799
And most importantly, a behavior shift within 30 to 60 days.

00:09:36.799 --> 00:09:39.440
For example, fewer fishing clicks.

00:09:39.440 --> 00:09:42.879
Ready to test this without a big rebuild?

00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:46.159
Here's a tiny pilot you can try next week.

00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:47.919
Call to action.

00:09:47.919 --> 00:09:50.320
One week gamification pilot.

00:09:50.320 --> 00:10:04.720
Pick one existing module and add three light lift elements such as a simple progress bar, one badge tied to a specific skill, and a short narrative introduction that sets the role, mission, and stakes.

00:10:04.720 --> 00:10:12.320
Then, compare completion, time on task, and post quiz decision quality against your non-gamified version.

00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:19.440
If you do try this, please share your takeaways with me on LinkedIn or leave a quick voice message on the show's page.

00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:23.200
I would love to spotlight your results in a future episode.

00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:30.320
To make this easy, I've added a one-page gamification pilot checklist as a public Canva template.

00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:33.600
Grab the link in the show notes, copy it, and make it your own.

00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:44.399
Before we close out the episode, I would like to share an inspiring quote by Jane McGonial, a game designer, researcher, and author of Reality is Broken.

00:10:44.399 --> 00:10:52.320
Games work because they align clear goals, simple rules, tight feedback, and voluntary participation.

00:10:52.320 --> 00:11:04.000
These four elements map neatly to learning goals as outcomes, rules as constraints, feedback as coaching, and voluntary participation as autonomy.

00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:11.919
If today's micromechanics got you inspired, we'll zoom out in a future episode to build a full virtual playground.

00:11:11.919 --> 00:11:19.039
Progression maps, feedback loops, and simple areas that connect across modules.

00:11:19.039 --> 00:11:27.919
As you design this week, choose one mechanic that truly serves the outcome and let learners level up on purpose, not just for points.

00:11:27.919 --> 00:11:33.679
Thank you for taking some time to listen to this podcast episode today.

00:11:33.679 --> 00:11:35.919
Your support means the world to me.

00:11:35.919 --> 00:11:44.639
If you'd like to help keep the podcast going, you can share it with a friend or colleague, leave a heartfelt review, or offer a monetary contribution.

00:11:44.639 --> 00:11:50.399
Every act of support, big or small, makes a difference, and I'm truly thankful for you.